On Thursday 02 September 2010 21:12:47 Timothy Pearson wrote: > In my opinion it would have been better for KDE3 as a whole if we could > have worked off the same codebase, but it seems that OpenSUSE has always > shipped a heavily modified version of KDE. Not all users want those > changes, so it is probably better to have the two separate versions. > Trinity is the equivalent of the old vanilla KDE, and has pulled in many > of the the non-SuSE specific patches from the SuSE RPMs, as well as other > sources. SuSE is what it always was, and I can respect that. > > I politely ask that this list remain focused for discussion about the > Trinity project itself, and that other projects that wish to remain > completely isolated from Trinity only be brought up on the trinity-devel > list in the context of GPL-released patches that can be applied to the > Trinity codebase. If you or others would like to discuss OpenSUSE, please > do it on their dedicated list(s). Seems you did not understand me. I am talking not about patches, but about applications. I suggested you to browse the OpenSUSE KDE3 repo to see if there are any apps you did not include in Trinity. Say, KBibTex, kde3-texmaker, schafkopf etc. I also plan to include other software such as KDE3-based version of VirtualBox, Firefox etc.