kubuntu-kde3.5-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net

Message: previous - next
Month: September 2009

Re: [kubuntu-kde3.5-users] ttf-bitstream-vera not in karmic anymore

From: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius@...>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:48:29 +0200
kb9vqf@... wrote:
> I finally got a large chunk of free time with which to fix bugs.
> 
> Therefore:
> * Bugzilla ( http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net ) is now back online, so
> bugs can be reported there instead of to this list
> * All of the below should be fixed
> * kvirc-kde3 is now in the repository

Working great!! Thanks!


> Please let me know if there are other issues/requests for Karmic!  (I
> might even consider KDE feature requests...send those to this list).

One small issue:
When booting I see this message:
/etc/rc2.d/S20kde-guidance-kde3: 31:
/usr/share/python-support/guidance-backends-kde3/displayconfig-hwprobe.py:
not found

On Hardy the package guidance-backends contains: 
/usr/share/python-support/guidance-backends/displayconfig-hwprobe.py

It appears guidance-backends-kde3 does install:
/usr/share/pyshared/displayconfig-hwprobe.py

I don't know exactly what is going on here, I could look more into it if 
that would help. Should I create a bug for this in Bugzilla?

A bigger issue seems to be language support. When I install and use 
kde-i18n-nl now, the menus in System Settings are still English. In 
Hardy, installing that package brings in two other packages 
automatically and those menus are in Dutch (but even there the two tabs 
stay in English). I will create a bug for this in Bugzilla, because I 
guess this won't be easy to solve.

Feature requests :)
- Use the kdm theme from Hardy
- Disable kpersonalizer on first log-on similarly to how it's disabled 
in Hardy


>> The control file of kde-style-qtcurve-kde3 I think should have a line:
>> Provides: kde-style-qtcurve
>> Right now it will trigger the install of gtk2-engines-qtcurve which
>> depends on kde-style-qtcurve which is the KDE4 package.
>> I think that many things may work better if such lines (provides with
>> the package name without -kde3 appended) would be added to all packages.
>> I also had a problem before where AcetoneISO was looking for konqueror
>> and did not like my konqueror-kde3 although it works fine with it. When
>> packages would need the KDE4 versions, they'll specify a specific
>> minimum version anyhow, so I think adding such a line would not break
>> anything.

I saw you did this for Konqueror now, but is there a reason to not do 
this for every package?

Thanks a lot for all your efforts! I think the Karmic with KDE 3 will 
become better than ever :)

Julius